Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro Some time back, I bought a for my Windows PC and ultimately moved it on to my Mac when that became my ‘main’ machine. It worked pretty well a few notable exceptions – the ‘intelligent face tracking’, RightSound and digital zoom features didn’t work (as these required the Windows software to work), and the camera’s built-in mike didn’t work with OS X’s speech recognition, although it worked fine with other OS X applications like.
Other than that I was pretty pleased with the results, and friends in Skype commented on how clear and sharp the picture was. In the continuing story of Logitech realizing there’s a world outside Windows, they released the which is essentially the exact same camera but for the Mac. In my usual way, I justified to myself that I could relegate the Pro 9000 back to my Windows PC and buy a shiny new Vision Pro with all it’s juicy Mac-goodness. Now if I were a synical person I’d say that all they’ve done is put a new silver bezel on the front of the Pro 9000, changed the activity light from orange to white, and shipped it out without any software, so it should be slightly cheaper right? No, it costs the same, so is it a good buy? What's in the box? Well the picture is as good as ever, naturally as the lens etc., is exactly the same.
1 Jul 2008 Logitech's new Mac-specific QuickCam Vision Pro (0) web cam just arrived. 24 Jun 2008 Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro for Mac Delivers Image-Perfect Detail, Exceptional.
The RightLight feature adjusts the exposure to compensate for bright or dark situations pretty well, and the microphone while working fine with Skype, still refuses to work properly with the OS X speech recognition system. If you look in the Apple support forums you’ll see there are lots of users complaining about their Logitech cameras not working with OS X’s built-in speech recognition. The other slightly worrying thing is that while the QuickCam Pro 9000 was actually recognized by OS X as a ‘Logitech Camera’, this Mac-specific version shows up simply as ‘unknown USB audio device’ – not terribly helpful, and perhaps indicative of what you’re getting. So it boils down to two questions really – which one to buy if you’re a Mac user? Well if I’m honest, either one will serve you just fine. If like me, your webcam is going to sit on top of a monitor in a reasonably well lit room, then the RightLight technology is pretty much superfluous, and there’s little else to separate the two in everyday use.
In fact if you own a Windows PC as well as a Mac then you can use the Pro 900 on either with good results. Similarly, if you already use the QuickCam Pro 9000 on your Mac is it worth changing to the QuickCam Vision Pro? In that case I would say it’s a definite ‘No’. The product smacks a little bit of Logitech just jumping on the Mac bandwagon by re-badging a Windows product. How difficult would it have been for them to port the face-tracking and digital zoom software feature across to the Mac?
Test Vga De La Quickcam Vision Pro For Mac
Likewise, had they ensured the built-in mike actually worked with OS X’s speech recognition feature, the camera would have been all the more useful. On said: Thanks for the insights on the 9000’s microphone issue with Apple’s speech software. Some web cameras use dual or noise-cancellation mics that might be at the root of that issue. Technically, the new Mac Vision Pro really is different under the casing: They’ve implemented RightLight2 and AutoFocus completely in HARDWARE rather than rely on the PC/Windows only software as with the 9000 Pro. While the 9000 largely works on the Mac – it’s auto focus does NOT, it simply behaves as a fixed-focus webcam. And many Mac users report really slow frame rates in low-light situations using the 9000.
So there’s reasons to buy up to the Mac Vision Pro for ANY platform. Because it is a driverless, even Windows and Linux users report great success with the Vision Pro’s hardware implementation.
The only other webcam with similar features and top not performance at this point is the HP Elite Autofocus. These two webcams point to the future; someday all quality USB webcams will be UVC and implement focus and light management in completely in hardware. On said: @DocMacPS – it’s a good point about auto focus. I never had a problem with the Pro 9000 on the Mac with regard to focus as anything up to about 9″ away was still relatively sharp, but yes anything closer would have shown up the weakness of the missing software feature. Normal daylight ‘Skype-ing’ with friends on various platforms also worked well with the Pro 9000 on the Mac, but again had I had video chat’s at night with subdued lighting I might well have been complaining more.
Certainly as a UVC webcam it’s a step in the right direction, although perhaps a shade early if they can’t yet implement the features that Mac users will think they’re missing when looking at the features list of the Windows version? Mind you, not having digital zoom is probably a blessing in disguise for some of my chat-friends =;-). On said: I bought a Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro for Mac six months ago. It worked very well to produce a video for YouTube. After several months to collect materials for the series, I started to make the second video. IT DID NOT WORK! QuickTime Player 7 runs from 5 to 30 seconds and then reports, “Recording stopped because there was an interruption in the input media.
Try quitting applications or disconnect devises that are using resources needed for recording.” Also, on iChat and Skype the screen is jittery. I have turned off Time Machine and Skype with no effect on the problem. Any report on how you have had this problem and have solved it would be appreciated. I did have to restart the computer a couple of times to get it to work on the first video.
Newegg.com - A great place to buy computers, computer parts, electronics, software, accessories, and DVDs online. With great prices, fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - Newegg shopping upgraded ™ If you are reading this message, Please to reload this page.(Do not use your browser's 'Refresh' button). Please if you're running the latest version of your browser and you still see this message.
Reading the Specifications of Webcams One of the most telling specifications of any webcam is the frame rate. This measures how many frames the camera captures every second. When a camera records just one frame per second (fps), the video appears very choppy.
Test Vga De La Quickcam Vision Pro For Macbook Pro
You will see very little correspondence between the person's mouth and the words he or she is speaking. A webcam with a frame rate of 30 fps on the other hand, will produce video almost as fluid as a television broadcast. Another important measurement is effective pixels. The more effective pixels your web cam has, the clearer the image will be.
The most basic webcams produce good images, but viewers may not be able to discern certain details. Features that should appear curved may look rectangular. 1.3 MP or more of effective pixels is ideal however lower amounts of pixels will work for most general purposes.